MBA23 Tom Bosschaert | Systems thinking helps to design better (urban) solutions in a complex world

In this episode I have a conversation with Tom Bosschaert founder of Except Integrated Sustainability about how better designed urban systems provide more value for their surroundings. It happens to be 25years since he founded Except Integrated Sustainability and a good moment to reflex to what he has achieved since. Based on his experiences Tom created the Symbiose in Development (SID) framework to help structure innovative solutions that actually provide resilience, autonomy and harmony to organizations. A pragmatic framework to keep the “Feet on the ground and head in the clouds” to ensure a organization is truly sustainable and future proof. The future is bright as he sees that “The long term investments associated with sustainability are becoming shortterm enough to match the traditional investment thinking”.


My revenue model is based how you rate this episode and willing to attribute a value for the creator (me). It goes in various names, such as
Value 4 Value (Adem Curry), Gift economy (Charles Eisenstein) or Pay what you want model
It could be a monetary value as a donation, membership or something different.
As it is always nice to receive an acknowledgement that you have liked what I do.

Here are some options how to support this podcast

⁠= join  ⁠⁠
= join
⁠= for a one time small contribution ⁠⁠⁠

= book a 1:1 follow up conversation.
= Join my emaillist to stay updated 
= Or something else, like helping me with the podcast or other topics I haven’t thought of


I thank you for your support ⁠and enjoy the conversation⁠⁠
 


Some takeout’s from our conversation

Fascination of systems thinking
It turns out when designing a better future a backgrond as a Industrial Design Engineer and Architecture and Urban Planning is beneficial as systems thinking is integral part of these disciplines. Tom is inspired by the book The Collapse of Complex Societies by Joseph Tainter, Bottom Up (Classic Systems Thinking), Limits to Growth (Club of Rome) and the Tipping points (Stockholm Resilience Centre)

Current global supply chains have become to complex
There are to many cause and effect chains, they are so long and so may intersect each other, that one minor disruption will have global consequences .
Resilience is not yet a KPI for global supply chains, in a world that is unpredictable and increasingly complex.

Growth (and its limits)
What is the limit for growth, (eco)nomic and or personal?
Changing (personal) patterns requires a different mindset
Vision of the future based on possible trends and scenarios based on risks and opportunities
Embrace complexity and accept constant changing parameters, resilience becomes imperative

Orchid City model (fully sustainable self-sustaining city model) [https://orchidcity.eco/]
12 agricultural systems
Symbiose of various nutrient systems to close nutrient loops
Industrial waste streams are used as input for new products
Input – output – input
Proven technology
Adaptive systems
Climate adaptive urban development

Biology
Plants actually clean the air using static electricity and transport the molecules to their roots where the microbes do the rest. So the tree needs real living (full of microbial life) soil. When one uses hydro beads as soil substitute, there are no microbes present to do the cleaning up for the plant and the static electricity cannot discharge in the soil. Office plants using hydro beads as such are not really living and thus also not cleaning the air. It is amazing that plants use the static electricity to charge themselves in order to grow upward, so on needs to ensure there is sufficient potential difference between the soil, roots and the upper part of the plant.

Framing of concepts
There is a need to go back to the roots of the meaning of words, like sustainability, circular economy and re-generative. The true meaning is getting lost under the weight of marketing who wants us to stay confused and lose focus. Where as in essence the concepts are really simple if you are willing to stick to it. Tom brings it down to 3 main characteristics: Resilience, Autonomy and Harmony. And this is also very similar to how biology operates.

Reason why SME are the future
SME’s are fast enough to move, have enough decision making power and have patient investors.

Reporting compliance vs real sustainabilty
ESG reporting is not the same as working on sustainably, it is an audit method to value the level of compliance to the certain standards.
Real sustainability requires a vision of the future, a set of ethics codes and the willingness to make it happen.


Did you find this conversation interesting? Become a paid subscriber in support of the podcast. Thank you in advance.
Making podcasts requires hours preparing and editing, and it is always nice to receive an acknowledgement that you have liked what I do
.
Become a paid member of my Gumroad community⁠


The Masters of Beautiful Achievements podcast series is where Alexander Prinsen explores natural science, innovation, systems thinking and leadership. As systemic innovation consultant at scopematters.com he helps organizations accelerate to save costs, do good and operate within the planetary boundaries.

Scroll to Top